ADVlist has new procedures for subscribing and unsubscribing.  Please
see the information at the bottom of this message.
==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Radio 171
American Dissident Voices Broadcast of October 23, 1999

Clinton's Call for "Tolerance"
by Dr. William Pierce

Hello!

I receive a number of letters from listeners who tell me, "Hey, I agree
with what you say about America's race problem, but I don't understand
why you're so hard on Jews. Certainly, the Jews who run the media are
bad, but the rest of them are just like us. Why do you talk about them
as if they're non-White?"

Actually, I've answered that question a hundred times on my programs.
Let me answer it again today. As you undoubtedly are aware, Pat Buchanan
will be a candidate for President of the United States in next year's
election. The other candidates presumably will be George Bush, Jr, for
the Republicans; and either Al Gore or Bill Bradley for the Democrats.
At present Buchanan is a Republican, but he may end up running as the
candidate of a third party, since he is unlikely to beat Bush for the
Republican Party's nomination.

I want to make it clear that I am not a Buchanan supporter. Buchanan is
the only candidate who comes even remotely close to being honest, to
being a man of principle, a man who means what he says and says what he
means. I have agreed with some of Buchanan's positions in the past, but
we also disagree on a number of fundamental issues, and I will not be
supporting him, partly because I cannot support the system under which
all the candidates will be running.

What I think about Buchanan isn't really important here, though. It's
what the Jews think about Buchanan that we'll talk about today. As you
might suspect, Buchanan is not a favorite with the Jews. For one thing,
he's a conservative. For another thing, he's spoken out against several
of the Jews' favorite wars. And he doesn't take orders well. So we
shouldn't be surprised if they don't give him rave reviews in their
media, such as the New York Times or the Washington Post. And they
don't. But if you really want to know how the Jews feel about Buchanan,
you must read what they say about him among themselves. When the Jews
write in the New York Times or the Washington Post, they are writing for
Gentile consumption. But they have their strictly kosher publications,
which the Gentile public never sees.

An example is New York's Jewish Press, which bills itself as the world's
largest-circulation English-language newspaper for Jews. Three weeks
ago, in the October 1 issue of the Jewish Press, a Jewish spokesman,
Professor Howard L. Adelson, had a column titled "Another Sewer Rat
Appears." Professor Adelson wrote, and I quote: "Out of the slime of the
sewers and into the filth of the gutter a desperate Patrick J. Buchanan,
the neo-Nazi, has crawled into the political arena using anti-Semitism
as his principal device to secure a future for himself." That's the
first sentence in Professor Adelson's column, and it's a bit awkward, so
I'll read it again for you, and you can savor it's Jewish flavor: "Out
of the slime of the sewers and into the filth of the gutter a desperate
Patrick J. Buchanan, the neo-Nazi, has crawled into the political arena
using anti-Semitism as his principal device to secure a future for
himself."

Well that's just the beginning of a very long column by Professor
Adelson, and every sentence oozes a vicious, Talmudic hatred. He goes on
to say that Buchanan -- quote --  "always was a neo-Nazi," whose  --
quote -- "ignorance is astounding" and  -- quote -- "reveals the shallow
quality of his tortured, sick, defective mind." Et cetera. In a separate
column in the Jewish Press Rabbi Rafael Grossman, the honorary president
of the Rabbinical Council of America, gives us his own outpouring of
Jewish hate against Buchanan.

In another Jewish newspaper, the October 1 issue of the Forward, which
also is published in New York, Harvard Law School Professor Alan
Dershowitz writes, and I quote: "Let there be no mistake about it. Pat
Buchanan is a classic anti-Semite with fascist leanings who hates Israel
and loves Nazi war criminals." -- end quote --  And Dershowitz raves on
and on, concluding, and again I quote: "Let us begin to think about Pat
Buchanan realistically. He is a bigot who appeals to the worst of
America. That's why he will always be a loser." -- end of quote --

Actually, that last statement of Dershowitz's displays the same sort of
deception that characterizes Jewish statements intended primarily for
the Gentile public. If Dershowitz really believed that Buchanan always
will be a loser because he "appeals to the worst of America," then
Dershowitz and his fellow Jewish leaders wouldn't be knocking themselves
out to vilify the man. The real meaning of Dershowitz's statement is
that the Jews themselves must do everything needed to insure that
Buchanan becomes a loser and doesn't gain any influence over American
policy.

Another Forward article, in the September 24 issue, reports on the
strategy the Jews are using to keep Buchanan from gaining any influence.
The article has a remarkably frank headline, namely, and I quote:
"Leadership Presses Bush in Bid to Block Buchanan from Republican
Ranks." The "leadership" referred to consists of the leaders of the
whole Jewish community, not just the media bosses: Jews such as Abe
Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith;
Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition; and
Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic
Council. If you think it strange for the head of the Republican Jews to
be working out a plan with the head of the Democratic Jews to apply
pressure to the principal Gentile Republican candidate to shut another
Gentile Republican candidate out of the election, then you still have a
lot to learn about Jews.

There are many other Jewish leaders and organizations involved in this
effort to stifle Buchanan. The Forward article lists, for example,
leaders of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Conference
of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the American
Jewish Committee, and so on. One of the most interesting recommendations
in the Forward article is that the Jews themselves should stay in the
background in their campaign against Buchanan and should use Gentile
"front" men as their tools against Buchanan: men such as Republican
candidate George Bush, Jr, New York real estate developer Donald Trump,
and Arizona Republican Senator John McCain. The idea is to keep the
public from understanding that the campaign against Buchanan is a Jewish
campaign, lest there be a public reaction against the Jews and in favor
of Buchanan.

And by the way, both the Jewish Press and the Forward are accessible to
anyone who wants to check for himself the excerpts I have quoted. The
Jews try to keep them out of sight of the Gentiles, but they can be
gotten hold of through any big library. They both have web sites on the
Internet, although you won't find the most revealing articles posted
there. But you can obtain subscription information from their web sites
and subscribe to them and read everything in them if you really are
interested.

Now, I'll say it again: I am not a Buchanan supporter. Buchanan and I
have quite different policies on a number of issues. Buchanan believes,
for example, that the United States should give Israel a permanent
commitment that we will use our weapons and armed forces to guarantee
Israel's military superiority over its neighbors. I am totally against
that. I am simply using this Jewish campaign against Buchanan as an
illustration of the way the Jews think and the way they work, so that
you will understand that Jews really are not like White people. They
have a psychology entirely different from ours. They are a race unto
themselves, a race with a totally subjective way at looking at the
world. Buchanan has never attacked Jews as such. He works with Jews; he
has Jewish associates. He simply refuses to let himself be used as their
puppet, the way virtually all the other politicians do. And because of
this the Jews are consumed with hatred against him and go all out to
keep him from gaining any public influence in America. The Jews simply
cannot tolerate an honest, independent Gentile leader. They are scared
to death of an honest man becoming President -- or even a dishonest man
who is independent, who will not take orders from them: a man they
cannot control. They understand that they have a tiger by the tail, and
if they lose their grip they are all goners.

Here's another illustration: Back during the Nixon period, 25 years ago,
I was puzzled as to why the Jews hated Richard Nixon so much, why they
worked so hard to destroy him. It is true, of course, that Nixon didn't
like Jews. I mean, who does? But Nixon did have a Jew, Henry Kissinger,
running America's foreign policy. He had another Jew, Leonard Garment,
as his chief White House counsel. He had a Jew, William Safire, as his
chief speech writer. He put a Jew, Herb Stein, in as chairman of his
Council of Economic Advisers. He appointed a Jew, Arthur Burns, chairman
of the Federal Reserve. He gave Israel everything the Jews demanded. But
the Jews obviously hated his guts, the way they hate Buchanan today.
Back then I didn't understand why.

Today I do understand. Richard Nixon, remember, gained his first
political prominence as a prosecutor of communist spies. And of course,
virtually all of those communist spies were Jews. The Jews as a whole,
not just those who were actively involved in communist espionage, never
forgave Nixon for that. That, coupled with Nixon's obvious dislike for
Jews, convinced them that he was a man who couldn't be trusted, a man
who might turn on them under the right circumstances.

Another example: I was a physics graduate student at Caltech, in
Pasadena, back in 1955 and 1956, and I was totally non-political at that
time. I used to run around with a fellow physics student who was a Jew,
Leo Levitt. Leo and I didn't talk politics, because I wasn't interested
in politics, but the two of us were in a group of other students one day
when someone mentioned Senator Joseph McCarthy, who a couple of years
earlier had made headlines by investigating communist subversion in the
government and in the U.S. Army.

Leo's whole demeanor changed when he heard McCarthy's name. He was
practically foaming at the mouth as he expressed his hatred of Joseph
McCarthy in the vilest language imaginable. Killing was too good for
McCarthy, Leo said. He should be tortured to death in fiendish ways,
which Leo described in detail. Leo's expression of hatred was so
vehement that it has stuck in my mind for nearly 45 years. Leo wasn't a
practicing communist himself and had never been involved in politics. He
was simply expressing a racial hatred that virtually all the Jews, of
every political persuasion, seemed to have against McCarthy, because
they regarded him as a threat to the Jews as a whole, a threat to the
Jewish race.

And the fact of the matter was that McCarthy never targeted Jews, as
such, in his investigations and never made public statements against
Jews. Like Nixon, he surrounded himself with Jewish aides, most notably
Roy Cohn and David Shine. Cohn and Shine had a homosexual affair, and
Cohn's efforts to keep Shine from being drafted by the Army and sent to
Korea made a laughingstock of McCarthy's committee. The Jews hated
McCarthy because they were unable to control him and because his efforts
were exposing Jewish subversion and the extent of Jewish involvement in
communism, even though inadvertently.

They hated Richard Nixon because Nixon also had exposed Jewish
subversion and the extent of Jewish involvement in communism, although
inadvertently. In addition Nixon did really dislike and distrust Jews
and often expressed himself on this subject to subordinates in the White
House. There's a lot of whining going on now as White House tapes with
some of Nixon's comments about Jews are being made public. This week's
issue of Newsweek magazine, for example, whines about Nixon's taped
comment that -- quote -- "most Jews are disloyal. . . . You can't trust
the bastards." -- end of quote -- The excerpts from the Nixon tapes in
this week's Newsweek also gave an example of why Nixon didn't trust
Jews. Referring to his work as a Congressional investigator of communist
infiltration of the U.S. government, Nixon said, and I quote: "The only
two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss. . . .
The only two non-Jews. Every other one was a Jew." -- end of quote --

Both McCarthy and Nixon, by investigating and exposing communists, had
frightened and angered Jews collectively. They tried to stay on the good
side of the Jews by appointing Jews to important posts -- hiring lots of
Cohns and Kissingers -- but the Jews still considered the two men a
danger, just as they consider Pat Buchanan a danger today, even though
Buchanan is willing to give to Israel guarantees which should not be
given.

And again, when I say that the Jews hate Pat Buchanan, just like they
hated Joseph McCarthy and Richard Nixon, I'm not talking about just
Jewish communists or the Jewish media bosses: I'm talking about the Jews
as a whole, the Jews as a race. And I know that there are individual
exceptions. McCarthy had his Roy Cohn and David Shine. Nixon had his
Henry Kissinger and Leonard Garment and Arthur Burns and the rest. And
Buchanan has his court Jews also. But don't be fooled by that. The Jews
hate Pat Buchanan collectively and subjectively, with the sort of
vicious, irrational hatred that is peculiar to Jews and not even
conceivable to us. They are different, and it is correct and necessary
to think of them as a whole, despite individual exceptions.

While we're on this subject, let's explore it a little further. As I
mentioned earlier, nobody really likes Jews, and that includes
politicians who surround themselves with court Jews for protection. But
the Jews tolerate and support some of these Gentile politicians, while
they undermine and attack others. What accounts for the difference in
the way they responded to Richard Nixon, say, and the way they respond
to Bill Clinton?

The answer, in brief, to this question, is that Nixon, despite the
strenuous efforts he made to please the Jews, despite his willingness to
do nearly everything they demanded of him, still held back a bit from
being the totally willing tool they wanted. Every time they made new
demands on Nixon, they sensed his hatred. Bill Clinton, on the other
hand, has no reservations whatsoever about serving the Jews. I'll give
you an example.

Last week I told you about the kidnap, rape, and murder of 13-year-old
Jesse Dirkhising by two adult homosexuals in Rogers, Arkansas, on
September 26. I told you that the news of this horrible crime had been
deliberately blacked out of the national news media by the Jewish media
bosses, but I provided information to help listeners find the news on
the Internet by going to the web site of the Northwest Arkansas Morning
News, which did report the crime. Some listeners reported back to me
that they still hadn't been able to find the news on the Internet, so
I'll add now that the crime also has been reported fairly extensively in
the Benton County Daily Record and in the Rogers Hometown News. Some of
the nastier and more lurid details of the crime are mentioned in these
two local newspapers. For example, one of the homosexuals, Davis Don
Carpenter, a 38-year-old hairstylist who brags that he has lived in 26
states and has boy friends in all 50 states, showed his homosexual
partner, 22-year-old Joshua Macave Brown, the proper way to tie up and
position a child for raping, even providing diagrams showing the proper
procedure and naming the best drug to use for sedating the child during
the rape.

Well, probably the technique worked well enough for earlier child-raping
episodes, but something went wrong when they raped little Jesse
Dirkhising. When they noticed that the boy had stopped breathing and was
turning blue they called 911. Police were met by a stark naked Joshua
Brown in the hallway, who explained that they  -- quote -- "were just
playing a game" with the dead child.

One other detail in connection with this crime: on October 2, just six
days after Jesse Dirkhising was raped to death, President Bill Clinton
was exchanging hugs and kisses with one of the larger groups of his
homosexual supporters. He was the speaker at a Democratic fundraiser in
Los Angeles hosted by a group called Action Now for Gay and Lesbian
Equality. The perverts donated $850,000 to the Democratic Party at the
dinner. The theme of Clinton's talk to the group was that Americans need
to become more tolerant of homosexuals and their life-style.

More tolerant. Really. You know, there was a court hearing for Carpenter
and Brown on September 28, in Bentonville, the county seat. The local
people were pretty unhappy, and so the two homosexuals were protected by
bulletproof vests and under heavy guard. Even so, a local reporter in
the courtroom could hear a woman outside yelling that the homosexuals
would "burn in hell." If Janet Reno had been there she would have had
the FBI arrest that woman for intolerance, and Clinton could have
collected another couple of hundred thousand dollars from the homosexual
lobby.

It's not just that Clinton chose to visit his homosexual supporters in
Los Angeles and to ignore the murder of little Jesse Dirkhising in his
home state. The government and the controlled media of this country, by
encouraging homosexuals, by trying to make us all believe that
homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else, that they
should be allowed to be teachers and Boy Scout leaders, and that we all
should be nice to them and let them do what they want and not be
suspicious of them or shun them, created the atmosphere in which the
murder of Jesse Dirkhising became possible. The two rapists were
emboldened by all of the propaganda calling for more tolerance for
homosexuals; by all of the media hullabaloo to win sympathy for Matthew
Shepard, the homosexual who was killed last year when he tried to pick
up a "date" in a bar in Laramie, Wyoming. This pro-homosexual propaganda
by Clinton and the media not only encouraged homosexuals to come out of
the closet and flaunt their perversion in public, it led some of them to
push harder than before against the heterosexual society around them, to
take chances they would not have taken before.

Did I make myself clear? I'm blaming the rape and murder of 13-year-old
Jesse Dirkising on the Jewish media and on the government which dances
to the media's tune. They encouraged Davis Don Carpenter and Joshua
Macave Brown to take a chance they would not have taken in a more
traditional moral environment.

I'm also saying that Bill Clinton, by ignoring the homosexual rape and
murder of Jesse Dirkhising and, just six days after that horrible crime,
running off to tell his homosexual supporters in Los Angeles that we all
need to be more tolerant of homosexuals and their behavior, proved once
again to the Jews that he is the sort of man they can trust, the sort of
man utterly without honor or scruple or principle they want as our
President.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist send an e-mail message to:
ADVlist-on@natvan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
matter.)

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy.  This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail:  national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

==>  TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:  
ADVlist-off@natvan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
matter.)

(c) 1999 National Vanguard Books