What is the National Alliance?

 • What its members believe

 • What they want to achieve

 • How they intend to do it

Building a New White World

prepared by the National Office of the National Alliance

IDEOLOGY OF THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE

THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE is not only working to achieve certain goals; it also stands for a comprehensive view of life, or worldview. Its goals have not been chosen arbitrarily in reaction to current social, racial, or economic problems, the way the Democrats and Republicans put together a party platform for election purposes; instead they follow naturally from Alliance ideology.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

A Natural Order

We see ourselves as integral with a unitary world around us, which evolves according to natural law. In the simplest words: There is only one reality, which we call Nature: not the “my reality” and “your reality” of the subjectivists and not the separate spiritual and physical realms of the supernaturalists. We are a part of Nature and subject to Nature’s laws. Within the scope of these laws we are able to determine our own destiny. If we err in our efforts there is no one to protect us from the consequences of our folly or our weakness. In other words, we ourselves are responsible for everything over which we have the power of choice: in particular, for the state of our environment and for the destiny of our race.

This view may be contrasted with the Semitic view, which separates man from the rest of the world and postulates a divine but nevertheless manlike being who rules man and the world by supernatural law. Those who hold this view absolve themselves of responsibility for their fate. When faced with an undesired outcome of events they say, “It is God’s (or Yahweh’s or Allah’s) will.” They believe that it is not necessary for men to concern themselves with the future beyond planning for their own needs, because their god has everything under control.

summit_x

During the time when Europe was most strongly under the influence of Semitic ideology (and also today in some countries under Islamic rule, as well as among some fundamentalist Jewish and Christian sects in America and elsewhere), it was considered impious for a man to infringe upon the deity’s prerogatives: specifically, to attempt to understand or to influence the phenomena of Nature, or to change venerable social institutions.

The Law of Inequality

racial_differences

Those races that evolved in more demanding environments advanced more rapidly.

Our world is hierarchical. Each of us is a member of the Aryan (or European) race, which, like the other races, developed its special characteristics over many thousands of years during which natural selection not only adapted it to its environment but also advanced it along its evolutionary path. Those races that evolved in the more demanding environment of the North, where surviving a winter required planning and self-discipline, advanced more rapidly in the development of the higher mental faculties—including the abilities to conceptualize, to solve problems, to plan for the future, and to postpone gratification—than those that remained in the relatively unvarying climate of the tropics. Consequently, the races vary today in their capabilities to build and to sustain a civilized society and, more generally, in their abilities to lend a conscious hand to Nature in the task of evolution.

Furthermore, just as the races may be ordered according to their levels of development, so may the individuals within a race. Some are better able to understand the world around them than others; some are more creative; some have better self-discipline or a stronger will; some have a more highly developed sense of responsibility. In a well-ordered society these differences will be reflected as various members having varying degrees of influence or control over the course of the society, according to the individual qualities of each member.

In contrast to our view is that of the egalitarians, who believe that the differences in the levels of civilization of the different races and the differences in the social positions of individuals in our society are purely circumstantial and can be changed easily by changing the circumstances: e.g., the level of civilization in Black Africa can be brought up to the European level and kept there by providing economic and technical aid to make up for past “injustices,” such as colonialism; and any individual can fill any position in society if he is given certain “advantages,” such as good schools and a good home environment. Differences in attainment, standard of living, and degree of social influence, among races and among individuals, are therefore unnatural and unjust and should be done away with, according to the egalitarians.

A Hierarchy of Responsibilities

Nietzsche

Nietzsche

As individuals who are conscious of our own nature and of our relationship to the rest of the world, we have an inevitable hierarchy of obligations or responsibilities.

First, we have an obligation to the Nature of which we are a part to participate as effectively as we can in its eternal quest for higher levels of development, higher forms of life.

This obligation has been recognized and expressed by our poets and philosophers throughout our history. Friedrich Nietzsche told us that our first responsibility is to help prepare the world for the coming of a higher type of man. George Bernard Shaw wrote that we are obliged to serve the Life Force in its striving to know itself more fully: i.e., to achieve higher levels of consciousness.

Shaw

Shaw

Second, we have an obligation to our race as a collective agent of progress. Nature has refined and honed the special qualities embodied in the Aryan race so that we would be better able to fulfill the mission allotted to us. Even though Nature also has developed other forms of life, including other races of man, we have a special obligation to our own race: to ensure its survival, to safeguard its unique characteristics, to improve its quality.

Third, we have an obligation to those members of our race who are most conscious of their own obligations and most active in meeting them. Thus, there is a bond of comradeship between us and those who also are working for the same cause.

Finally, we have a responsibility to ourselves to be the best and strongest individuals that we can be.

Our acceptance of this hierarchy of responsibilities is in contrast to the attitude of the individualists, who do not recognize a responsibility to anyone but themselves; and to that of the humanists, who eschew their racial responsibility.

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF BELIEF

We may summarize in the following statement the ideology outlined above:

We see ourselves as a part of Nature, subject to Nature’s law. We recognize the inequalities that arise as natural consequences of the evolutionary process and that are essential to progress in every sphere of life. We accept our responsibilities as Aryan men and women to strive for the advancement of our race in the service of Life, and to be the fittest instruments for that purpose that we can be.

NATIONAL ALLIANCE GOALS

Our goals follow from this worldview, and like it they are evolutionary. That is, our goals for the next decade are steps on the way to our goals for the next quarter-century, which in turn are steps on the way to the things we want to achieve a century from now, and so on. It may seem unrealistic for us to describe in detail the type of world we are aiming at a millennium or even a century hence, because, although we know which principles must govern that world, we cannot be sure exactly how they will be realized. Not only are there the uncertainties of fortune, but we expect to learn from our experiences and to modify accordingly the ways in which we implement our principles.

Nevertheless, it is useful to have a concrete picture now of the world for which we are striving, even though we understand that this picture will evolve, and its details will change. If we think of the world that we want to forge from the ruins of the present world, we might fix our sights on things as we would make them a quarter-century hence, after our enemies have been vanquished, the strife of revolution has subsided, and the spiritual and physical debris of this era has been cleared away. We can then describe, at least in outline, certain essential features that new world must have.

They are, in brief:

White Living Space

In spiritually healthier times our ancestors took as theirs those parts of the world suited by climate and terrain to our race: in particular, all of Europe and the temperate zones of the Americas, not to mention Australia, New Zealand, and the southern tip of Africa. This was our living area and our breeding area, and it must be so again. After the sickness of “multiculturalism,” which is destroying America, Britain, and every other Aryan nation in which it is being promoted, has been swept away, we must again have a racially clean area of the earth for the further development of our people. We must have White schools, White residential neighborhoods and recreation areas, White workplaces, White farms and countryside. We must have no non-Whites in our living space, and we must have open space around us for expansion.

We will do whatever is necessary to achieve this White living space and to keep it White. We will not be deterred by the difficulty or temporary unpleasantness involved, because we realize that it is absolutely necessary for our racial survival. The long-term demographic trend toward a darker world, which the disastrous policies of the last century have caused, must not only be halted; it must be reversed.

An Aryan Society

We must have new societies throughout the White world that are based on Aryan values and are compatible with the Aryan nature. We do not need to homogenize the White world: there will be room for Germanic societies, Celtic societies, Latin societies, Slavic societies, Baltic societies, and so on, each with its own roots, traditions, and language. What we must have, however, is a thorough rooting out of Semitic and other non-Aryan values and customs everywhere. We must once again provide the sort of social and spiritual environment in which our own nature can express itself in music, in art and architecture, in literature, in philosophy and scholarship, in the mass media, and in the lifestyles of the people.

living_space2

In specific terms, this means a society in which young men and women gather to revel with music created by White artists and composers, but never to undulate or jerk to negroid rhythms of any kind. It means pop music without rap overtones and art galleries without Jewish-inspired ugliness and sickness. It means films in which the appearance of any non-White face on the screen is a sure sign that what’s being shown is either archival newsreels, foreign news, or scientific footage – or an historical drama about the bad, old days. It means neighborhoods, schools, work groups, and universities in which there is a feeling of family and comradeship, of a shared heritage and a shared destiny. It means a sense of rootedness, which in turn engenders a sense of responsibility and energizes a moral compass, so that people once again know instinctively what is wholesome and natural and what is degenerate and alien. It means spiritual feeling coming from the soul and unencumbered by superstition or dogma, soaring free and reaching far above today’s priest-ridden, church-bound spirituality.

A Responsible Government

The size of a government is less important than whose government it is.

The size of a government is less important than whose government it is.

We must have a government wholly committed to the service of our race and subject to no non-Aryan influence. It must be a government guided by fixed principles, yet able to respond in a flexible way to challenges and opportunities. It must be structured and organized in a way suited to its purpose of safeguarding and advancing the race, and it must be as immune to corruption and subversion as human genius can make it.

In America we have had ample experience with two tendencies in government. During the first century or so of the American republic, we had a government that to a large degree embodied the principle that the best government is the least government, reflecting the general distrust of governments that was shared by many of the framers of the U.S. Constitution. This government provided for the national defense, for the mails, and for a number of other functions more or less helpful or necessary to the orderly existence of the nation, but it interfered relatively little in the lives of its citizens and left most of them to take care of their personal needs in the way they saw fit.

With the growth of mass democracy (the abolition of poll taxes and other qualifications for voters, and the enfranchisement of non-Whites), the rise in the influence of the mass media on public opinion, and the insinuation of the Jews into a position of control over the media, the U.S. government was gradually transformed into the malignant monster it is today: the single most dangerous and destructive enemy our race has ever known.

Many patriots look back fondly at the government as it was in its first phase, when it was less democratic and less intrusive in the lives of citizens. Perhaps the time will come when we can afford to have minimal government once again, but that time lies in the remote future. The fact is that we need a strong, centralized government spanning several continents to coordinate many important tasks during the first few decades of a White world: the establishment of White living space, the rooting out of racially destructive institutions, and the reorganization of society on a new basis.

The central task of a new government will be to reverse the racially devolutionary course of the last few millennia and keep it reversed: a long-term eugenics program involving at least the entire populations of Europe and America. Such a task is necessarily intrusive, and it will require large-scale organization.

The structural details of a new government are important, but they are not a matter of principle. One might even get the job done by continuing with mass democracy, simply by replacing the people who control the mass media with Alliance members, and perhaps that is a reasonable way to proceed during a transitional period. In the long run, however, we want an honest government, not one that hides behind the carefully managed illusion that tens of millions of voters are its real rulers. A government of and by politicians is not only grossly inefficient, it remains too susceptible to corruption and subversion, regardless of who controls the organs of public opinion.

We need a government every branch of which is staffed by people carefully selected and trained for their responsibilities, not by people who are merely liars with charisma. We need a government of men and women who actually respect that government, and whose attitude toward its mission is essentially religious: a government more like a holy order than like any existing secular government today. It might not be too much to say that the most important single institution in the government we want will be the one that selects, trains, and tests the people who will be the judges and legislators and the executives in that government: people who will be more like secular priests in their behavior and their attitude toward their work than like today’s politicians and bureaucrats. The institution that prepares these people for their work must be incorruptible and single-minded, with our principles engraved in the souls of its teachers.

A New Educational System

America's current educational system has lost any clear understanding of purpose.

A new educational system must possess a clear understanding of purpose.

A proper educational system serves three purposes: it passes a people’s cultural, intellectual, and spiritual heritage from generation to generation; it teaches skills and techniques; and it guides the character development of individuals from childhood to adulthood. The first purpose is served by teaching facts and ideas: language, history, science, ethics, and so on.

The second purpose is served by teaching the child or young adult how to do things that will be useful to himself and/or society: how to play a musical instrument, how to weld, how to manage a business, how to type, how to repair a motor vehicle, how to fight with and without weapons, how to draw, how to swim, how to raise children, how to grow food, how to build a house.

The third purpose is served by challenging, testing, conditioning: by forcing the child to exercise his will, to discipline himself, to endure discomfort, to make plans and carry them out, to overcome fears, to accept responsibility, to be truthful, and generally to develop and strengthen those traits of character valued by a healthy Aryan society.

The present educational system in America completely neglects the third purpose and does poorly with the first two, even in those fortunate areas not yet encumbered with an appreciable “multicultural” contingent. The most important reason for its poor performance is that it has lost any clear understanding of purpose. In order to pass on a people’s cultural, intellectual, and spiritual heritage, it must first know the answer to the question: Which people’s heritage? Today such a question is Politically Incorrect and therefore not admissible.

Even many decades ago, before it became Politically Incorrect to understand that the heritage to be passed on is European, there was no depth of purpose. The reason for passing on the European heritage is not just to help young people qualify for higher-paid employment or become better dinner-table conversationalists. It is to instill in them a consciousness of what it means to be European—a race consciousness—and thereby to make racial patriots of them. Facts and ideas have a spiritual component, and this component must be emphasized in the educational process.

There certainly will be sexual and occupational specialization in the second area of educational activity, and sexual specialization in the third. Even in the first area, children undoubtedly will be separated according to ability: not every child needs to learn Greek and Latin and the infinitesimal calculus to acquire a feeling for his race and its ways. Nevertheless, a proper educational system should provide a common body of knowledge and understanding shared by everyone, so that every member of the society has a fully developed sense of peoplehood. The boy who aims at becoming a machinist should read Homer, at least in translation, and the boy who plans to teach literature should understand what it means to be a good welder, at least to the extent of trying his hand at it.

It is by pursuing the third purpose, however, that a new educational system will make the most radical contribution to Aryan society. Education that concerns itself with the development of the whole person and focuses as strongly on forming character as on imparting knowledge or teaching skills dates back to ancient Greece, and it enjoyed an all-too-brief revival in the mid-20th century in National Socialist Germany, before being outlawed by the advocates of permissiveness. Today permissiveness rules throughout the Aryan world. “Education” is something that takes place only in designated buildings for a few hours on prescribed days, under conditions approaching chaos. Inside or outside these buildings, discipline is minimal. Children grow up in a world without standards of performance, without clear guidelines for behavior, without any strong source of authority. We see the products of this system all around us: too many weak, indecisive men and too many unfeminine women; a general lack of significant goals and self-confidence; a self-indulgent population without self-discipline or inner strength, restlessly seeking “happiness.”

By ensuring that each child born to our race grows into the strongest, most capable, most responsible, and most conscious future citizen that his genes make possible, we will gain an enormous advantage over any race without such an educational system.

An Economic Policy Based on Racial Principles

Personal gain must not be the only motivation for our new society.

Personal gain must not be the primary motivation for citizens in our new society, and capital must never be able to purchase legislation.

There are two fundamental criteria that must be used for judging each and every governmental intervention in economic matters. They are, first, the long-range welfare and progress of the race; and second, human nature. Which is to say that in evaluating any economic policy we must ask ourselves two questions: Will this policy ultimately be beneficial or detrimental to the quality of our race? And is it in accord with human nature?

We look first at the racial effects of a policy and insist that they must be positive—or at least not negative—and then we insist that the policy be based on a clear and realistic understanding of human nature, so that it is workable.

We can understand better the significance of these two principles if we consider briefly two quite different economic systems, Marxism and laissez-faire capitalism.

Marxist economics has human happiness rather than racial progress as its ostensible aim, and it is based on assumptions that are at odds with reality and with human nature. It aims at providing material comfort for everyone, more or less equally. It cannot even admit the possibility of racial progress, because that implies that some types of men are inherently superior to others and that some directions of development are more desirable than other directions.

Whether one prefers the Marxist goal of the greatest happiness for the greatest number or the National Alliance goal of stronger, wiser, and more beautiful men and women is a matter of one’s values. It was not on its choice of values that Marxism foundered, however, but on its refusal to recognize the fact of human inequality and the nature of human motivation. When people are not permitted to work for their own profit and advancement, they do not work well; and when a society’s leaders do not attain their positions through their own merit, that society is likely to be poorly led.

In contrast to the Marxist system, we recognize the need to permit people to compete, to reap the fruits of their labor, and to exercise leadership according to their demonstrated ability. They will work harder and more efficiently and will order themselves in a hierarchy of ability. The result will be a stronger, better-led, and more prosperous society. There will of course, be those individuals who will not work or whose natural abilities are such that they cannot compete effectively. Rather than following the Marxist path of robbing the successful in order to reward the unsuccessful, we must take measures to ensure that society’s lowest elements do not multiply and become more numerous in later generations.

The laissez-faire capitalist system provides another illustrative contrast. Under such a system the society as a whole has no goals: there are only the goals of individual men and women. The capitalist system, like ours, provides strong incentives for individuals: the strong, aggressive, and clever rise and prosper, and the weak, indecisive, and stupid remain at the bottom. Leaders tend to be capable—at least, in the capitalist economic environment, with its special conditions.

Without a unifying principle, however, a capitalist society easily can fall prey to certain inherent weaknesses. One of these weaknesses is the instability that leads the rich to become richer and the poor to become poorer, not solely because of differences in ability but because the possession of capital gives the possessor an enormous advantage in the competition for more capital. When personal gain is the only motivation in a society, those who already are rich can arrange things to favor themselves: they can buy the legislation they want, and they can block threats to their power in ways that may be destructive to the welfare of the society as a whole. They can hold down the price of labor, limit healthy competition within the society, and exploit the environment without regard for the long-range consequences.

The overly rigid social stratification resulting from unrestricted capitalism can lead to endemic class hostility and even to class warfare. It can slow racial progress by making the ability to acquire and hold capital the supreme survival trait.

We need an economic system that, in contrast to Marxism, allows individuals to succeed in proportion to their capability and energy, but that, in contrast to capitalism, does not allow them to engage in socially or racially harmful activity, such as stifling competition or importing non-White labor. We need to structure our economic system so that it cannot fall prey to the instability of capitalism. We need to maintain social flexibility, so that capable and energetic individuals always have the possibility of rising. We need to ensure that capital does not have the possibility of changing society’s rules to suit itself. The way to achieve and maintain an economic system that meets these criteria is to design and to govern the system subject to the supreme principle: the ultimate aim of all economic policy is racial progress.

PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE

White men and women find themselves a dwindling minority in the world; while Black and Brown populations are growing at an increasing rate, White populations nearly everywhere are at best static. Furthermore, there is an increasing immigration of non-Whites into formerly White areas, accompanied by miscegenation on a massive scale.

If we had only this demographic problem to deal with, our task would be easy. White governments have the means necessary for halting non-White immigration and for deporting non-White populations. Such measures, together with a withdrawal of economic and technical aid to the undeveloped areas of the non-White world, would permit natural forces to reverse non-White population growth quickly. Non-Whites have no ability to counter such measures, militarily or otherwise.

America’s most degenerate urban populations have become so degraded morally and ideologically—so acclimated to egalitarianism and “multiculturalism”—that all we can hope to salvage from them is a selected White minority, while the majority perishes in the chaos preceding the final conflict. They can offer no effective resistance to determined governmental action.

Unfortunately, since the end of the Second World War, no White government has been under the control of White men with our values and our ideology. White governments everywhere are terminally corrupt, led by collaborators with the Jews. No solution to our demographic problem can be implemented—and, therefore, no future for our race can be secured—until we regain control of our governments. Our program, therefore, must have as one of its goals the attainment of governmental power. Nothing short of this can be meaningful in the long run.

By governmental power, we mean, of course, the power to make and to execute all government policy. This implies a massive replacement of the existing power structures: legislatures, courts, military and police command cadres, and the mass media.

As we build our revolutionary infrastructure and increase our ability to reach the public with our message, the weaknesses in our opponents’ infrastructure will become increasingly apparent. At the same time worsening conditions in America will make the public more receptive to us.

As we build our revolutionary infrastructure and increase our ability to reach the public with our message, the weaknesses in our opponents’ infrastructure will become increasingly apparent. At the same time worsening conditions in America will make the public more receptive to us.

No mere election of a head of state can give us this power; no president or prime minister, even if he is installed by a military coup and has the backing of the top military leaders, can stand alone against the other elements of the power structure in a modern, White state—especially not against the power of the mass media. In order for any power we acquire to be meaningful it must be total: that is, it must include all the major elements of the power structure.

No non-violent uprising by a militant White element of the population can succeed by itself, nor can a violent uprising, in which marches and demonstrations are accompanied by direct action and street fighting, achieve success—so long as the major elements of the power structure remain in the hands of our enemies. No modern, White state can be overthrown by a mob howling outside the citadel; the revolutionaries must already have established a sufficiently strong position inside the citadel before their cohorts outside begin howling. One may think of the so-called “civil rights” revolution in the United States in the decades after the Second World War, in which Blacks burned cities and marched in huge, often violent demonstrations and eventually got their way. The burning and marching would have availed them nothing, however, had their sympathizers not already been solidly entrenched in the mass media, the Christian churches, the governmental bureaucracy, and the legislatures and courts of the land. In our case the situation is reversed, with those bastions of the power structure in the hands of those who hate us most intensely.

The power we seek cannot be attained by any trickery or subterfuge, by any scheme of gradual infiltration and subversion, by any sudden coup, or by any other superficial or insubstantial means. It can only be attained by first building a solid revolutionary infrastructure capable of sustaining revolutionary action on many fronts over a period of years and then erecting on that infrastructure a power structure of our own, in which each essential element of the power structure opposed to us has its analogue.

Our power structure does not seek to imitate the one we want to replace, or even to compete with it in the normal sense. For example, it would be foolish to imagine that we could build revolutionary police or military structures that could compete effectively with those of the government. But we can build structures with certain military and police functions that have as their immediate task the coordination of recruiting inside the government’s military and police agencies. Their later tasks can be to serve as fully ramified cadres for incorporating and organizing the best human material from the disintegrating governmental military and police structures.

Even our mass media do not attempt to compete with those of the enemy by winning larger audiences. Ours merely aim at reaching the entire White population with our message and making it continually accessible to those who are responsive. We understand that by far the larger part of the White population is and will continue to be more interested in spectator sports or Hollywood films than in our message, and we will not try to wean them away from their amusements. Only in the very last stages of revolutionary development will we be competing with the Jews for the attention of this mass element, but by then the competition will be on our terms. Our mass media, however, eventually will provide the indispensable tool for communicating with all the elements of the White population during a critical transitional period between the collapse of one way of life and the establishment of another. A successful attainment of governmental power will not be possible without this tool.

The skeptic, or the person who cannot imagine a state of affairs very different from the one he is accustomed to, will look at the enormous disparity in every element of the power structure between us and our enemies, and he will think that our goal of gaining governmental power is not attainable—and that if it were possible, it would be only through building a power structure larger and stronger than that of our opponents: building a revolutionary army with more soldiers than the U.S. Army; building television networks with more viewers than ABC, CBS, and NBC; building political organizations able to get more voters to the polls than the Democrats or the Republicans. But this is not necessary.

It is not necessary for two reasons: First, the power structure of our opponents is undergoing rapid, degenerative change. It might seem too much to say that the governmental power structure in the United States is self-destructing before our eyes, but its pathology becomes more apparent month by month in many ways: in the increasingly tawdry, “show business” style of political campaigns; in the ever more frequent revelations of the legislators’ corruption, personal depravity, and disregard for the laws they make; in the government’s increasingly evident fear of its own citizens; above all, in the loss of governmental will to deal with problems requiring strong, decisive, and perhaps unpopular action. It is losing its moral authority and its credibility with the people it governs; fewer and fewer of them regard their government as more than an expensive nuisance, as witnessed by the growing number who have simply stopped voting.

The police and military structures still wield a considerable amount of physical power, based to a large degree on modern technology: computerized police files of dissidents, sophisticated surveillance and eavesdropping equipment, drones, laser-guided missiles, “smart” bombs, and the like. The quality of the human factor in their power is declining rapidly, however. It is not just the ravages of “Affirmative Action” programs on the average competence of government workers or the loss of esprit de corps in the remaining White personnel: more important is the fact that the government’s police and military forces have to a very large degree lost their sense of moral justification. They still may be convinced that they are strong enough to impose their will on their opponents, but they no longer have the unshakable conviction that they represent the side of right and justice; idealism has given way to careerism and cynicism. In the long run this will be a mortal weakness.

Even the news and entertainment media, despite their overwhelming influence on every other element of the power structure and on most of the population, are becoming increasingly vulnerable. A growing element of the public regards the media with suspicion, recognizing their anti-White bias and their destructive effect on morals and culture. Large numbers of people have already ditched the evening news broadcasts from the Jewish-controlled networks and get their news from the alternative media, among which our broadcasts and publications are increasingly influential and well-known.

The second reason why we don’t have to build a power structure as large as the one opposed to us is that all the elements in the population we want to reach with our message are becoming increasingly responsive to that message. At the same time the opposing power structure is losing its own partisans. The government and the Jewish media will continue to have their hard core of support—Jews, feminists, some homosexuals, some Christians, the radical-liberal New World Order enthusiasts, most of the state and Federal bureaucrats, and others on government or media payrolls—but outside these special constituencies our enemies have very few real friends left, even among their beneficiaries. Blacks and Mestizos as a whole, for example, can hardly be considered a staunch bulwark of the government, despite the favoritism it has shown them. The American population has become much like the Roman mob of old, ready to cheer for any government which can provide it with bread and circuses, but equally ready to turn against the government the moment the supply of those commodities is interrupted—and never ready to defend the government if any personal sacrifice is required.

To summarize the preceding paragraphs: The situation in America is no longer quasi-static, as it was during most of the 1970s and 1980s. During that earlier period the Jewish media were able to keep nearly all of the public hypnotized, to provide a false reality for them in the place of the real world around them. Someone would complain that America was becoming darker, poorer, and dirtier. The media would drown him out with a chorus about the value of “diversity,” about the evils of “racism,” about the wonders of the coming egalitarian paradise, and the complaint would be ignored and forgotten by nearly everyone.

Blacks burn Ferguson, Missouri: Now the hypnosis is beginning to wear off, as reality becomes too harsh to ignore.

Blacks burn Ferguson, Missouri: Now the hypnosis is beginning to wear off, as reality becomes too harsh to ignore.

Now the process of decay and disintegration has accelerated; now the hypnosis is beginning to wear off, as reality becomes too harsh to ignore. The process will continue to accelerate in the future. More and more people will notice that, indeed, the emperor is stark, staring naked, even as the Jewish media continue to extol the beauty and grandeur of his new raiment and denounce those benighted souls who refuse to acknowledge it.

The process is inherently unstable, and nothing that the enemies of our people can do will reverse it. Their power structure will continue to become more pathological, if not physically weaker, in all its elements, and more and more members of the White public will receive our message sympathetically. No one can predict in detail the outcome of this unstable process after it reaches the point where we are able to exert a significant influence on its further development. It is clear, however, that our responsibility now is to continue building a revolutionary infrastructure able to support an opposing power structure that can respond advantageously to all developments.

A revolutionary infrastructure is the structured collection of people and other resources organized for the purpose of carrying on, over an extended period, the full range of activities necessary to the purpose outlined above. Among the necessary activities are the generation and dissemination of propaganda, recruiting, fund raising, self-defense and internal discipline, intelligence gathering and evaluation, planning and guidance. It is the continued enhancement, development, and expansion of such activities that alone can lead to the attainment of the ultimate revolutionary goal.

ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL ALLIANCE MEMBERS

The members of the National Alliance participate in all of the activities mentioned above, especially in recruiting and in the dissemination of the National Alliance message to the public. This latter activity is made possible by the National Alliance’s development of several media: a weekly radio program, a variety of recorded materials, and a wide range of publications.

Radio broadcasting: The National Alliance’s weekly program, American Dissident Voices, reaches White people around the world via the Internet. The program is aimed at a more general audience than most of the National Alliance’s other media. It reaches many thousands of people each week who know that something is seriously wrong with the way their world is being run, but who need help in understanding the details and in comprehending the overall picture, so that they can accept their responsibility to work for a better future.

Distribution of printed materials: Members use National Alliance printed materials—single-issue stickers and flyers, printed versions of our online publications, and others—to reach the public. By distributing these materials in their communities, they raise public consciousness of important issues, provide essential information not readily available elsewhere, and give interested persons a way to contact the National Alliance. Some members distribute these materials impersonally and anonymously, and others distribute them in a way that provides an opportunity to meet recipients face to face and engage them in conversation.

Internet activity: The National Alliance maintains three Web sites on the Internet. The addresses are natall.com (our main organizational page, where first-time readers can discover who we are and what we stand for—and join us); nationalvanguard.org (our online magazine, with hundreds of text, image and audio files available to the public, including articles from National Vanguard magazine, the text of our other publications, and a number of audio files that permit visitors to actually listen to our radio broadcasts at their convenience); and whitebiocentrism.com (an online community which allows like-minded individuals who are serious about advancing our cause to interact, educate, and help one another). As we re-enter the field of print publications, books, pamphlets, and other works will also be available on these sites.

Letters, meetings, and other activities: Many members make telephone calls to radio talk shows or write letters to the editors of newspapers or magazines as a way of disseminating the National Alliance message. Some members invite interested persons to listening parties in their homes and then play an American Dissident Voices program or National Alliance speech as a way of introducing their guests to the Alliance.

Recruiting and cadre building: Many members participate in the process of building the National Alliance by engaging in one-on-one recruiting of selected individuals whose training, skills, or talents make it possible for them to increase the Alliance’s capabilities. Thus a member who is on the faculty of a university looks for other faculty persons or for exceptional students who are receptive to the National Alliance message; a member who is a businessman seeks opportunities to sound out and recruit other business people with whom he comes in contact; a member who is serving in the armed forces or in a police agency uses his daily interactions with career personnel to select exceptional individuals who are receptive, and he then gives them the opportunity to serve their race while carrying out their military or police functions.

HISTORY OF THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE

WLP_portrait_

William Pierce

The National Alliance was formally organized in February 1974. Many of its first members came from another organization, the National Youth Alliance, which had been founded in 1970 in Virginia by Dr. William Pierce, a young physics professor who left a career of teaching and research at Oregon State University to devote himself to the service of his people. Dr. Pierce worked with the eminent writer and classicist Professor Revilo P. Oliver in the founding and early years of the National Youth Alliance.

Although the ideologies of the two organizations were identical, membership in the National Youth Alliance had been restricted to persons under 30 years of age, and that group focused its activities on college and university campuses. Thus, the formation of the National Alliance effected a broadening of the appeal of the National Youth Alliance to include White persons of all ages and occupations.

Revilo Oliver

Revilo Oliver

Because the early 1970s were a politically and socially turbulent period, during which Jews and others—sometimes under the guise of opposition to the Vietnam war—were organizing violent demonstrations in the streets of America’s cities and calling for the destruction of White society, the National Youth Alliance took a militant, confrontational stance in opposition to this destructive activity. The name of the group’s first periodical, the tabloid ATTACK!, reflected this stance. During this early period the National Youth Alliance organized many public activities, including street demonstrations with placards and banners denouncing not only the communists, Jews, and other avowed enemies of White America but also the government that tolerated and even encouraged them.

Unfortunately, the scale of the National Youth Alliance’s public activities was too small to make a significant impact on current events, government policies, or the public’s consciousness. These activities also did not lead to much increase in organizational strength: many of the people who were attracted to the National Youth Alliance by the publicity that its activities generated had only shallow, short-term motivations.

As Dr. Pierce and his co-workers came to appreciate more fully the magnitude and the time scale of the task facing them, their approach became more fundamental. By the time the National Alliance was formed in 1974 the programmatic emphasis had shifted from a superficial confrontation with the enemies of our people to the building of the necessary organizational foundation for a final victory over those enemies. Simultaneously the emphasis in recruiting shifted from quantity to quality. In April 1978 the name of the National Alliance’s periodical changed from ATTACK! to National Vanguard. The red headlines and exhortations to action in the publication were replaced by sober analyses of the political, social, and racial situation and of the task facing our people.

This is not to say that the National Alliance softened or moderated its approach to the struggle; indeed, May 1978 saw the publication of the first edition of Dr. Pierce’s first novel, The Turner Diaries, which had earlier been serialized in ATTACK! and which provoked a storm of reaction from the government and the controlled media. The more fundamental and longer-range program after this time nevertheless brought with it a more mature and serious public image for the National Alliance.

In 1978 a group of members who were especially interested in the religious or spiritual basis of the National Alliance’s work organized the Cosmotheist Community Church, members of which formed the core leadership of the Alliance.

wgs_portrait_

William Simpson

From 1978 the rate of membership growth also increased substantially for several years. By 1983, however, the stasis of the Reagan era had set in, and recruitment slowed. Throughout the remainder of the 1980s there was a gradual decline in membership numbers, and the National Office experienced great difficulty in recruiting staff members of the caliber needed to carry its work forward. In August 1985 the National Office moved from the Washington, DC, area to a rural, mountainous area in West Virginia.

The National Alliance published its second book in 1980, member William Simpson’s Which Way Western Man? In the same year it issued the second edition of The Turner Diaries. In 1984 it published the reprint volume, The Best of ATTACK! and National Vanguard Tabloid, edited by member Kevin Alfred Strom, an associate of both Dr. Pierce and Dr. Revilo Oliver.

Kevin Strom

Kevin Strom

In 1987 the National Alliance’s publishing arm, National Vanguard Books, was reorganized as a separate entity. In 1989 Dr. Pierce’s second novel, Hunter, was published. In 1991 member Randolph Calverhall’s novel, Serpent’s Walk, was published.

By the end of the 1980s the climate for recruitment began changing. In much larger numbers than before, White Americans began realizing that their country was headed over the brink to dissolution and ruin and that the politicians in Washington were unwilling and unable to avert disaster. People became much more responsive to the National Alliance’s message. Membership doubled in 1990-1991 and again in 1992.

In 1991 National Vanguard Books began publishing audio recordings and in December 1991 the National Alliance began broadcasting its message worldwide via shortwave radio with the weekly program American Dissident Voices, founded and hosted by member Kevin Alfred Strom. Before the advent of the Internet, the program was also carried by a number of AM and FM radio stations in the United States.

In 1993, under the direction of the Alliance’s first full-time Membership Coordinator, Green Beret veteran William White Williams, a comic book was published as a youth education and outreach tool.

The first issue of Free Speech, a monthly print periodical containing the texts of our radio broadcasts, appeared in January 1995; the broadcasts are now published on nationalvanguard.org.

National Vanguard Books published Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin in 1999, Blood Ritual in 2001, and The Lightning and the Sun in 2002. The second edition of Which Way Western Man, edited by Jerry Abbott with revisions by the original author, was published early in 2003. The first edition of the National Alliance Membership Handbook was issued in the 1970s, and a greatly expanded edition was published in 1992.

Construction of facilities at the National Office has been continual. Two older farm houses were remodeled, the main office building was erected in 1985, and additional steel buildings were constructed in 1997, 1999, and 2002. The latest of these, the leadership building, can hold meetings with up to 300 participants.

On 23 July 2002 the National Alliance suffered a major blow. Dr. William L. Pierce, the founder and leader of the National Alliance, died, and, in the leadership vacuum, persons unfamiliar with—or opposed to—the foundational principles of the Alliance, both organizational and spiritual, took power. A “big tent” approach was tried, and the sections of the Membership Handbook listing Christianity as an opposed ideology were gutted. The qualities that had set the National Alliance apart from other pro-White groups—its spiritual basis, its high standards, its uncompromising ideology—were discarded. The Alliance was converted into just another competing “White rights” organization, something for which there was essentially no need or demand. The quality of Alliance publications began to suffer, as less competent staff were hired. As time passed, the radio program, print publications, and Web publications ceased. Membership and supporter numbers—and quality—plummeted.

Many of Dr. Pierce’s stalwart supporters and staffers, including Fred Streed, Dr. Robert de Marais, Will Williams, Kevin Alfred Strom, Jerry Abbott, and others, were expelled or resigned over these issues. Independent publications and support groups were set up to preserve the National Alliance and William Pierce legacy during these dark years, especially through Will Williams’ organizing and publishing efforts, incuding the William Pierce Legacy Web site; and the efforts of Kevin Alfred Strom on the National Vanguard Web site.

Will Williams

William White Williams

During the years since 2002, several efforts to restore the Alliance were made. Success finally arrived in 2013 and 2014. In late 2013, in the wake of the announced dissolution of the Alliance as a membership organization by its successor Chairman, Erich Gliebe, William White Williams and Kevin Alfred Strom announced the re-formation of the Alliance under the original principles set out by Dr. Pierce. An office and media complex was built for the Alliance in the mountains of eastern Tennessee. American Dissident Voices broadcasts resumed in December 2013 under the program’s founder, Kevin Alfred Strom, and the National Vanguard Web site once again became the official online publication of the Alliance. Through the leadership and personal sacrifice of Will Williams, in 2014 the National Alliance libraries, including the invaluable personal research library of Dr. Pierce and many invaluable historical artifacts, letters, and personal possessions of Dr. Pierce, were saved from loss or the auctioneer’s block. In late 2014, Erich Gliebe finally agreed to resign and turn over control of the National Alliance, National Vanguard Books, the Cosmotheist Community Church, and all their assets to a new board chaired by Will Williams, at which point the National Alliance and the reconstituted Alliance became one. The Alliance has resumed its uncompromising, fundamental, and revolutionary approach.

WHY YOU SHOULD JOIN THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE

Strength in unity: As a member of the National Alliance you will be doing something about what is happening to your world, instead of just complaining about it. You will be joining your strength to that of many other men and women with the same beliefs and goals. Working alone you can accomplish relatively little; working in concert with others you can have a much greater effect on the course of events around you.

Guidance for members: By keeping informed through internal National Alliance publications of other members’ activities and of ongoing National Alliance programs, you will have both guidance and a wider scope for your own activity. You will be able to draw on the experience and special knowledge of other members instead of relying entirely on your own guesswork.

new_world_x

Making your life count: Nothing in life is more satisfying and fulfilling than making a commitment to a great and impersonal goal and then devoting one’s talents and energies to its achievement. As a National Alliance member you will be taking a hand in shaping the future and in determining the destiny of your race. By doing so you will share in its immortality.

A necessary task: In addition to the personal satisfaction and fulfillment of doing something which really matters and which makes your life count, you should join the National Alliance because it is the right thing to do. Any White person who can see the threat to the future of the race today and who refuses, whether from cowardice or selfishness, to stand up for his people does not deserve to be counted among them. The task of the National Alliance is an extraordinarily difficult one, but it is necessary, and that should be the only consideration for any man or woman with a fully developed sense of responsibility.

REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP

Eligibility: Any White person (a non-Jewish person of wholly European ancestry) of good character and at least 18 years of age who accepts as his own the goals of the National Alliance and who is willing to support the program described herein may apply for membership.

Ineligible persons: No homosexual or bisexual person, no person actively addicted to alcohol or to an illegal drug, no person with a non-White spouse or a non-White dependent, and, except in extraordinary circumstances, no person currently confined in a penal institution may be a member. (The National Alliance does not advocate any illegal activity and expects its members to conduct themselves accordingly.)

Application procedure: Any eligible person who wishes to become a member of the National Alliance should fill in completely the application and mail it, along with the $25 application fee and his first month’s dues, to the address on the form. A new member will receive a membership pin, a Membership Handbook, and each issue when published of the National Alliance’s internal membership newsletter. (Dues payments are voluntary donations in support of the National Alliance’s work. They are not payments for goods or services rendered to the member.)

Anonymity: The anonymity of members is protected scrupulously; as a general policy, no member’s name will be publicized or revealed to any other person without the member’s explicit consent. Beyond this, a membership applicant who is concerned that his or her welfare, security, or effectiveness as a member might be jeopardized if there were any possibility at all that his or her membership in the National Alliance were revealed may, if he wishes, hold membership under a nom de guerre. Such an applicant should write to the Chairman stating his intention to use his nom de guerre on his application form and on all his correspondence about National Alliance matters. His membership card will be issued with that name on it, and he will receive all his mailings from the National Alliance addressed to that name. No records with his true name will be retained. It will be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that mail addressed to his nom de guerre will be delivered to him by the postal service and to take all other measures required to protect his anonymity, such as paying his dues with cash or money orders instead of personal checks. The National Alliance does not recommend that an applicant use a nom de guerre without a sound reason for doing so. It will not look favorably on any applicant who selects a frivolous nom de guerre.

Supporter category: Those who, because of personal circumstances, wish to support the Alliance’s efforts without joining may do so by following the procedure below. Supporters will also receive our internal newsletter.

Become a member:

Download and print a membership application, fill it out, and then mail it to:

National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery TN 37680 USA. (online application form coming soon)

Become a supporter:

Simply fill out our online donation form — or, for those who prefer to use cash via the postal service, just download and print our supporter’s form, fill it out, and then mail it to the above address.