American Dissident Voices Broadcast of September 19, 1998

A Confluence of Crises
by Dr. William Pierce

We are living in interesting times, and they become more interesting
almost by the day. I want take a look today at a surprising confluence
of developments around the world. The most interesting recent
development here in the United States, of course, has been the bottom
dropping out of the prestige and credibility of the U.S. government.
People around the world understand that the United States is still
dangerous, but they regard us about the way we would regard a drunken
bully with a loaded shotgun. We want to stay out of his way, but we
certainly don't respect him. And this development is due only in part to
the disgrace of Bill Clinton. And the disgrace of Bill Clinton is not
due primarily to the fact that he had a sexual relationship with Monica
Lewinsky or even that he lied about it. We expect politicians in a
democracy to be liars, and we certainly shouldn't be surprised when
their sex lives become a bit more complicated than those of the rest of
us.

No, the disgrace of Bill Clinton is not that he shows himself to be a
lecher and a liar, but that he shows himself to be a fool. Imagine, the
so-called "leader of the free world" explaining to a federal grand jury
why he believes that Monica Lewinsky had a sexual relationship with him,
but he didn't have a sexual relationship with her. Really! Not only does
Bill Clinton lose every shred of credibility and dignity, but so does
the government which he heads. And, in the eyes of the world, so does
America.

And I should mention in this regard that we haven't even seen the worst
of Clinton's disgrace yet. He is in essence a scumbag, a piece of White
trash, who has lied and cheated and stolen all his life. He got away
with it until Monica Lewinsky and Ken Starr pulled him down, because he
is a talented and charming liar who was supported and protected by the
media bosses. But now that he's down -- now that he is no longer of any
=use= to the powerful Jews who formerly supported and protected him --
there will be revelation after disgusting revelation about him, as the
media hounds stumble over each other in their efforts to dig up and
expose every bit of dirt in Clinton's life. And believe me, there's more
dirt there than you ever thought possible. Just wait, and you'll see.
You'll see the sort of filth that our political system in America is
filled with.

The media commentators, with their overwhelmingly Democratic sympathies,
have been contrasting Bill Clinton's disgrace with that of Richard Nixon
nearly 25 years ago, and they all have concluded that Nixon's crimes
were much worse, that the case for impeachment of Nixon was much
stronger. Perhaps so. Nixon wasn't the personal scumbag that Clinton is
-- Nixon didn't push cigars into the bodily orifices of female employees
in the White House -- but he undoubtedly, like everyone else who has
been President during the past 60 years or so, was a criminal. But these
debates about whether Clinton or Nixon was the bigger criminal all miss
the point. The crime for which Clinton should have his head impaled on a
spike on the White House gate is not that he is a scumbag or a perjurer:
it is that he is a =traitor.=

Clinton has had two aims throughout his adult life: his first aim has
been to please himself, to indulge himself; and his second aim has been
to please the people who could advance his career. All too often this
latter aim has meant trying to please Jews: he has packed his
administration with Jews from top to bottom. His two appointees to the
Supreme Court are both Jews. Except for the good ol' boys he brought to
Washington from Arkansas, most of the people around Clinton, most of his
former boosters and supporters, have been Jews. And now that he has
embarrassed them -- with a Jewish woman; isn't that a bit of irony? --
now that he has embarrassed them, they are in the forefront of those
pulling him down.

But never, in his lifelong quest to please himself and to satisfy his
supporters, has Clinton been concerned with the interests of America or
of his race. During the Vietnam war he was demonstrating for America's
communist enemies, smoking dope, marching in the street, and chanting,
"Ho, Ho, Ho Chih Minh, the Viet Cong's gonna win!" When his Jewish
boosters sneaked him into the White House nearly six years ago, he
immediately began pushing more anti-American programs: homosexuals in
the military; trying to globalize the American economy by pushing more
American jobs overseas; opening America's borders even more to the Third
World; hanging onto all of the government's so-called "affirmative
action" and "diversity" programs, despite the damage these
minority-coddling programs have done to our society; selling missile
technology to China so that they might make the missiles aimed at us
more effective, and finally serving as the front man and spokesman for
the Jewish program to have a majority non-White America before the
middle of the next century. Those are the capital crimes for which
Clinton should be punished, not his self-indulgent debauchery with a
Jewess and his foolish attempts to cover it up.

Regardless of all the ironies involved, the situation we have in America
now is one of weakness exposed -- not military or economic weakness, but
moral weakness -- and in the long run that is the most dangerous sort of
weakness. And as I said a moment ago, it's not just Bill Clinton: it's
the system which put him in office, and it's the American electorate who
voted for him, the American public which still gives Clinton a high
approval rating, the American public which still thinks he ought to
finish his term in the White House instead of in prison.

The public cannot approve of a moral leper without exposing its own
moral weakness. The whole world sees a weak and foolish American public
led by foolish, weak, self-indulgent criminals, who dance to whatever
tune is played by the Jewish media bosses. And I mean the whole world,
not just Osama bin Laden and others who have a personal score to settle
with us. This loss of moral authority, this loss of national dignity and
prestige, will not be easily restored, and it may cost us dearly.
Americans may not understand this now, because they are still
comfortable -- but we will see.

At the same time that we are having a moral crisis in America, much of
the rest of the world is poised on the brink of economic catastrophe.
Let's start with Russia, which is in the middle of a full-fledged
economic and political crisis. I've spoken with you before about the
Russian situation. I told you in my program two weeks ago how Russia was
for all practical purposes stolen by gangsters collaborating with the
Soviet bureaucracy during the process of privatization. The Soviet
government, instead of selling shares in government-run enterprises,
such as factories, mines, television networks, and so on to the Russian
people, essentially gave these enterprises to Jewish gangsters. The
result is that today half of the Russian economy is owned by seven
billionaires, and six of those seven are Jews, and they all have ties to
organized crime. Much of the remainder of the Russian economy is also in
the hands of organized criminals. Russia's nominal president, Boris
Yeltsin, a Slavic version of Bill Clinton, was essentially put into
office by these Jewish gangsters, who used their stolen wealth and their
control of the Russian mass media to support him. In turn, Yeltsin takes
orders from these Jews. He is as much under the control of the tiny
Jewish minority in Russia as Clinton is under the control of the Jews in
the United States.

The economy in Russia has collapsed because the Jews who run the country
have behaved like a gang of pirates dividing up stolen booty. They care
about neither Russia nor the Russian people. Their one concern, other
than getting their loot safely stashed in Swiss banks, is keeping the
Russians from organizing against them. Russian nationalism, Russian
patriotism, is their nightmare. If the Jews in Russia were as smart as
they think they are, they would keep a much lower profile. They would
not flaunt their wealth in the face of the starving Russian people. They
would not boast about their political power and their control of
Yeltsin, as one of them in particular, Boris Abramovich Berezovsky,
likes to do. But Jews seem to have a boom-or-bust mentality. They seem
as unable to moderate their behavior as Bill Clinton is unable to keep
his zipper up. Instead of backing off a bit during Russia's current
crisis they have moved to tighten their grip on the country by having
one of their own installed as prime minister.

The new prime minister of Russia, Yevgeny Primakov, chosen by Berezovsky
and the other Jewish oligarchs, has been praised by the New York Times
as a tough, experienced bureaucrat: just the sort to straighten out
Russia's economic problems. What the New York Times has not said is that
"Primakov" is not the name he was born with. His family name actually is
Finkelstein, and his Jewish parents called him "Pinchas" -- Pinchas
Finkelstein. prime minister of Russia. Amazing, isn't it? It's almost
like something right out of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,
this grasping, leering, insatiable greed of theirs.

They believe that with their control of the mass media, their gangster
tactics in their business operations, and former secret police boss
Finkelstein/Primakov heading the government, they can continue
exploiting the Russian people just as they have done for the last 80
years, since they overthrew the Russian government and murdered the
Czar. Perhaps they're also counting on the fact that when they ruled as
communists they selectively murdered two generations of the best of the
Russian people. The Bolshevik commissars and their Red rabble murdered
not only those Russians who resisted their rule, but also everyone who
might resist it in the future. They slaughtered whole classes of the
Russian people: not just the aristocrats, but also the small landowners,
the Russian middle class, the Russian intellectuals, the officer class
-- 20 million bearers of the best genes altogether. They wanted to
create a country of couch potatoes, a country of democrats, of lemmings,
who would not resist them and who could not compete with them. And for
80 years it worked, more or less -- although the evidence indicates that
Stalin was ready to turn on them just before his sudden death in 1953.

When communism collapsed at the beginning of this decade, many Jews in
the Soviet Union decided that the game was pretty nearly up, and they
got out while the getting was good, flooding primarily into Israel and
the United States, bringing much of their stolen loot and their
organized crime with them. The tiny minority of Jews who remained in
Russia are almost unbelievably arrogant and greedy. Despite their
present strength, despite the fact that they still have their hands on
the levers of power in Russia, their position has not been so precarious
in any country since Hitler broke their grip on Germany in the 1930s. If
the Russian people become any hungrier, or if a Russian nationalist
comes to the fore in Russia, the Jews are likely to be finished in
Russia -- utterly finished -- in a single, violent uprising of the
people.

In the past the Jews have counted on being able to play off one White
nation against another when any danger confronted them. When the Germans
threw them out in the 1930s, they were able to use the United States as
a weapon to destroy Germany. And I'm sure that if the Russians do turn
on them and begin cleaning up Russia, they'll try to get the United
States to start a war against Russia: not in our own name, of course,
but using NATO or the United Nations as our instrument, just as in the
case of the war against Iraq a few years ago. At the moment, however,
with Clinton in disgrace and America's prestige abroad lower than it has
been at any other time since the Second World War, the Jews might have
trouble getting a war against Russia started.

And so we do have an interesting confluence of events in the United
States and Russia: two countries so far apart, both under tight Jewish
control, and both currently involved in a crisis. As for the rest of the
world -- especially Asia -- we also have a precarious situation which
could become much worse in the near future. Asia's prosperity in recent
decades has been the direct result of the export of American technology
and American industry. American corporations, lured by the prospect of
extremely low wages in Asia, began having their products manufactured in
Indonesia, Malaysia, China, Taiwan, and so on. Eventually many Asian
countries developed their own manufacturing capabilities and went into
competition with the American companies which had built factories in
Asia. That really helped to bring the cost of computer chips down, but
the economies of many Asian countries became very dependent on their
export industries. A slight decrease in the export market could bring on
an economic crisis. And because of the policy of economic globalization
which both Clinton and his predecessors have been pushing, crises tend
to spread quickly from one country to another.

The current Asian problems are nowhere worse than in Indonesia and
Malaysia. Continued and widespread rioting in Indonesia brought down the
government there a few weeks ago. In neighboring Malaysia the economic
crisis is also extremely severe, following the collapse of that
country's currency late last year. In this regard it is interesting to
note that the prime minister of Malaysia has accused Jewish billionaire
currency speculator George Soros of deliberately wrecking his country's
economy by manipulating the exchange rate of the Malaysian monetary
unit, the ringit, relative to the dollar. That's the way Soros has made
his billions: speculating in currency. The media and his bought
politicians refer to him with great respect, almost with reverence, as
an "investor," but in fact he's the stereotypical Jewish money-changer.

And it is also interesting to note that as soon as Malaysian Prime
Minister Mahathir made his accusation against Soros, the U.S. Congress
sent a resolution to Malaysia complaining that Mahathir is being
"anti-Semitic" and calling for his resignation. Isn't that something?
Soros is an international currency speculator from Hungary who meddles
in the economies and in the politics of countries all over the world and
has done enormous damage to many of these countries while reaping
enormous profits for himself. And as soon as anyone complains about the
destructive effects of his currency speculation, the U.S. Congress leaps
to his defense and accuses his critics of being "anti-Semitic." Would
the U.S. Congress have concerned itself if Soros weren't a Jew? Soros,
needless to say, has been one of Clinton's backers, and he also has
close ties to several of the gangster oligarchs in Russia.

Now, I do not believe that the Jews have deliberately caused the
political and moral crisis in America or the political and economic
crisis in Russia or the economic crisis in Asia -- even though they have
their hands in everything that's happening. I don't believe that they
deliberately caused these crises because the crises are not in their
best interests.

You know, when an infection sickens and kills a person, it's fair to say
that the disease organism which caused the sickness and death didn't
deliberately kill the person, because the person's death is not in the
interests of the bacteria or viruses or whatever. When the host dies,
they die. I believe that the Jews in Russia would prefer to continue
sucking the blood of the Russian people indefinitely, without any
crisis. I believe that the Jews who supported Clinton and used him as a
catspaw to implement their programs and policies would have preferred
that he not disgrace himself. I believe that George Soros would have
preferred to take his profits in currency speculation without causing
the collapse of Malaysia's economy. Of course, if a country does
collapse in chaos as a result of his destructive speculation, all he
really cares about is that there's another country handy for him to sink
his fangs into.

But motivations, interesting though they may be, are not our primary
concern. Our primary concern is to free ourselves of Jewish influence,
regain control of our destiny, and try to restore our society to health.
And that also, I think, is the primary concern of Russian patriots now.
And it also should be the primary concern of the peoples of Asia. It is
mere chance, a fluke, that we have such a confluence of crises in the
world today. But the basic cause of all of these crises is the same. In
each case we have failed to keep our own house secure and in order. We
have permitted aliens to infiltrate and gain the upper hand over us.

If early in this century Russia's Czar Nicholas had thoroughly cleansed
Russia instead of getting into a war with Germany, a completely
senseless war against his own kinfolk -- if he had just gotten rid of
the Jews in Russia instead of simply keeping them cooped up in the Pale,
there never would have been a Bolshevik revolution and 20 million of the
best of his people would not have been butchered.

If we in America had controlled our borders, kept control of our own
mass media, and paid a little more attention to keeping our government
and our political system clean, we never would have people like Bill
Clinton in public office. And if the Asians had not let themselves be
seduced by the lure of quick riches through so-called "free trade," they
would not be facing their current economic catastrophe. All of us should
have paid much more attention to our own traditions, our own values, our
own ways of doing things, and the Jews never would have gained a
foothold anywhere. George Soros would be sitting behind a table in a
synagogue somewhere in the Middle East changing money for his fellow
Jews instead of wrecking nations in Asia.

I know that much of what I have said today sounds a bit strange to many
of my American listeners. They are shocked and fascinated by the Clinton
situation at the moment, but they really believe that pretty soon
everything will settle down and be the way it was before. And if Asia
doesn't go over the brink toward which it is sliding now, things will
seem to return almost to normal in America for a while -- for a while --
if Asia doesn't go over the brink and pull the West down with it.

And so not believing that they're in any real danger, most Americans
don't like to hear about Jewish conspiracies. They want to believe that
Jews are pretty much like everyone else -- just a little richer and
perhaps a little pushier. They want to believe that nothing really bad
will happen. That's unfortunate. In Russia, I believe, the people will
take a more realistic view of things. At least, I hope they will.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail:  national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

(c) 1998 National Vanguard Books