American Dissident Voices Broadcast of July 18, 1998

Thoughts on the Fourth of July
by Dr. William Pierce


Two weeks ago we celebrated the Fourth of July, America's biggest
patriotic holiday. It's a time when we celebrate our strength, brag
about our accomplishments, remember our victories, and so on. It got me
to thinking about the Second World War, and I'll share some of my
thoughts on the war with you.

In that regard, the British, our allies in that war, also have been in
my thoughts recently. What made me think about the British in relation
to our Fourth of July celebration is the fact that just two weeks
earlier the British Parliament passed a law lowering the age of consent
for homosexual activity to 16. This new law, which was approved by
Parliament on June 20, was campaigned for heavily by the so-called
"chicken hawk" lobby. "Chicken hawks" are adult male homosexuals who
prey on young boys. They pick up boys on streetcorners, ply them with
drugs or drink, give them money, and sodomize them. It used to be that
they could be arrested and prosecuted for such activity. Now they can't.
Now it's legal, as long as the boys are 16 years old. The "chicken
hawks," a number of whom actually hold seats in Parliament, already are
clamoring for the legal age to be lowered to 14. With Bill Clinton's
good friend Tony Blair as prime minister now, the "chicken hawks"
probably will get what they want.

Now how is that relevant to the Second World War? I'll tell you. Hitler
and his wicked Germans, you see, didn't approve of homosexual activity.
After Hitler became chancellor of Germany in 1933, a homosexual who
sodomized a 16-year-old boy in Germany and got caught was in big
trouble, and I mean big trouble. A lot of homosexuals wound up in
concentration camps, and not all of them came out again. Even today they
still whine about how Hitler made them wear pink triangles on their
clothes and persecuted them. But fortunately for the "chicken hawks,"
Britain and America went to war against Germany, and now homosexuals
everywhere have full rights. More rights, in fact, than the rest of us.
If we hadn't fought for the rights of homosexuals in the Second World
War, then "chicken hawks" wouldn't have the right to sodomize young boys
today: certainly not in Germany, and probably not in Britain or the
United States either. Winning the war against Germany set ideological
fashions for the whole world.

Of course, it wasn't just the rights of homosexuals we fought for in the
Second World War. In fact, that part of it was kept pretty quiet back in
those days. What we were told publicly was a whole rah-rah chorus of
Fourth of July things: we fought for equality, against book-burning, for
free speech and freedom of the press, for the rights of women and
children, et cetera. Many of these excuses for going to war against
Germany were based on falsehoods -- or at least on misrepresentations.
Book burning, for example: every American has been shown pictures of
Germans throwing books on bonfires, and the story was that Germans could
read only books approved by the government. Americans were made to
believe that the books being burned were confiscated from the homes of
Germans who had been packed off to concentration camps for having them
and that it was illegal to own such books in Germany.

Actually, the bonfires were symbolic; they were intended to express
public disapproval of certain types of books: pornography, communist and
Jewish propaganda, and the like. Before Hitler became chancellor, the
communists were very powerful in Germany, the Jews owned many publishing
houses, and pornography flourished. Hitler's government wanted to set an
example for the public; it wanted to show its attitude toward socially
harmful and trashy books. And so public bonfires were staged, and a lot
of pornography -- along with a lot of Marx and Freud -- was burned to
let the public understand that the literary tastes of the government had
changed sharply when Hitler became chancellor. It was not illegal to own
books of the sort burned in the bonfires, but everyone understood that
they were considered degenerate or socially harmful. It wasn't until
after the war that laws were passed banning Politically Incorrect
literature altogether. For example, today, in democratic Germany, it is
illegal for anyone to attempt to publish or distribute any of the books
I have written, and so we must make German editions of these books
available through the Internet, where Germans who are brave enough to do
so can download them, print copies, and secretly distribute them to
their friends. Virtually every other book which the Jews consider
offensive or dangerous to their interests is also banned. It is even
forbidden to utter certain words or express certain ideas orally in
public. There are literally hundreds of political prisoners sitting in
German prisons today who wrote, or said, or otherwise gave expression to
prohibited ideas. That didn't happen under Hitler. It couldn't happen
until after we had beaten the Germans in the Second World War. And by
the way, don't hold your breath waiting for Mr. Clinton to express the
sort of concern for these current German political prisoners that he
expressed recently for Chinese political prisoners. It won't happen.

Or take the rights of women and children. Much of the war propaganda
produced by Roosevelt's heavily Jewish Office of War Information -- the
OWI -- during the Second World War was designed to make Americans feel
morally superior to Germans and to feel justified in waging genocidal
war against them. I remember one very effective propaganda poster
produced by the OWI. It showed pretty, semi-nude girls with German
officers in a brothel. The legend on the poster was "Deliver us from
evil." The idea it was promoting was that the Germans forced young women
in the countries occupied by their army to work as sex slaves in
military brothels.

This propaganda was totally false. Although the Japanese engaged in such
behavior, the Germans never did. The Germans' behavior toward conquered
peoples, insofar as looting and rape were concerned, was more civilized
than that of any other participants in the war, including the Americans.
The people with the worst record in this regard, of course, were our
gallant Soviet allies, who were deliberately encouraged to rape and
murder civilians by their Jewish commissar of war propaganda, Ilya
Ehrenburg. I quoted some of Ehrenburg's murderous exhortations to the
Red Army in my program on the sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff earlier
this year.

One picture from this period which is burned into my mind is a
photograph of a teen-aged German girl, about 15 years old, in a Berlin
train station shortly after the occupation of the German capital by
victorious Allied forces. The blonde girl has just been gang-raped, the
legend under the photograph tells us, and she is in a state of shock,
with tears streaming down her face. The photograph was published in Life
magazine in September 1945. I have kept a vivid memory of it for more
than 50 years. The media in this country usually covered up such
atrocities. All most Americans ever heard about from the media were the
supposed atrocities committed against the Jews by the Germans. This
photograph is, so far as I know, the only one of a German victim which
was given wide circulation, despite the hundreds of thousands of German
women raped by the forces of democracy at the end of the war. My
reaction to that photograph -- and I first saw it at a time when I
believed the propaganda story that the Germans had killed millions of
innocent Jews in gas chambers during the war -- my reaction was that if
this one girl could have been spared her ordeal it would have been worth
another six million Jews going to the gas chambers.

But, unfortunately, that's not the way it worked out. And today, as a
direct consequence of our waging war against Germany, hundreds of
thousands of other European women have been forced into sex slavery by
White-slave racketeers headquartered in Israel. In fact, it is safe to
say that if America had not gone to war against Germany, there would be
no international trade in White slaves today. If the German view of
things had prevailed, instead of the Jewish view -- backed by
Anglo-American and Soviet military force -- there would be no Jewish
organized crime gangs operating in Europe today, no White women being
forced into prostitution by these Jewish gangs, and no state of Israel
to provide an international headquarters for the White-slave trade.
Hitler's Germany would not have tolerated White slavery in Europe, and
his example and moral backing almost certainly would have allowed the
opponents of White slavery in the United States and elsewhere to prevail
over the Jews. At the very least, the Jews could not have kept a
White-slave operation secret, because the Germans certainly would have
kept the whole world alerted. As it is now, any German who dares to
speak of the Jewish control of the White-slave trade will be imprisoned
under democratic Germany's "hate speech" laws, and we have to depend on
occasional slips of the tongue by the Jews themselves, such as the
article on White slavery which appeared in the New York Times in January
of this year, and which I already have cited in several of my
broadcasts.

You know, all of this is really peripheral to the principal ideological
justification for the Second World War, and that was egalitarianism. One
theme which the Jewish propagandists in the OWI worked into their
propaganda more than any other was the idea that the Germans considered
themselves "supermen," superior in every way to non-Germans, and so it
was our duty to disabuse them of this illusion. Well, of course, the
Germans were pretty proud of themselves, even if they didn't really
believe that they were "supermen," as the Jews claimed they did. And
they certainly weren't egalitarians. They believed, for example, that
White people, that Europeans, were superior in intelligence and
creativity and the other skills of civilization to Black Africans. Well,
virtually all White Americans believed exactly the same thing in those
days, so the OWI distorted and misrepresented the German belief so that
White Americans wouldn't recognize it as the same as their own belief.
The Germans were portrayed as very arrogant, very intolerant, and very
brutal: as people who believed they were "supermen" and were entitled to
plunder and abuse all the rest of us.

One of the best-known examples of the way in which the Jewish
propagandists successfully misrepresented the Germans in this regard was
connected with the interaction between Adolf Hitler and the Black
athlete Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin. Owens, of
course, won three gold medals in sprinting and jumping, and the
propagandists gleefully trumpeted that he had humiliated the German
"supermen" and had -- quote -- "smashed the myth of Aryan superiority."
-- end of quote --  They also concocted the story that Hitler, angered
by the Black's athletic victories, had "snubbed" him and refused to
shake his hand in a show of bad sportsmanship. The Jewish media spread
this story so successfully that it is still repeated today, despite the
fact that it is completely false. The Germans, of course, were not
humiliated at all in the 1936 Olympics. In fact the Germans were the
clear winners, with more gold medals than anyone else. More silver and
bronze medals than anyone else too. Hitler's Germany won a total of 89
gold, silver, and bronze medals, compared to 56 for Roosevelt's United
States. The games were an enormous triumph for the Germans rather than a
humiliation. And Hitler didn't "snub" Jesse Owens. In fact, Hitler stood
and waved at Owens when the Black athlete passed the reviewing stand.
Owens always felt that he had been treated royally by the Germans and
couldn't understand how the stories about a "snub" got started. Well, we
understand, don't we?

Anyway, the Germans were portrayed by Jewish propagandists as a bunch of
arrogant, heel-clicking, monocle-wearing egomaniacs who believed that
they were "supermen" and that everyone else was a "subhuman." It was up
to the democratic and egalitarian Americans to whip them and teach them
the error of their ways. That was the theme of a thousand Hollywood
propaganda films. Well, we did whip them. We bombed their cities into
ruins, we slaughtered German men, women, and children by the millions,
and then after we had beaten them we killed another million or so of
them and hanged their leaders. We taught them a real lesson in democracy
and egalitarianism.

And today we are reaping the benefits of that great victory of ours. We
are getting a real lesson in democracy and egalitarianism ourselves.
Democracy gave us Bill Clinton as our President. Egalitarianism gave us
the racial mess we have in our schools and our cities. Democracy and
egalitarianism will make us a minority in our own country within the
next few decades. That's what Bill Clinton was gloating about when he
made that amazing speech at Portland State University last month. Whites
will become a minority in America, he said, and it will be a good thing.
It would be "un-American" of us to oppose it, he said. And you know, if
Americanism is defined in terms of the things we fought for in the
Second World War, then Mr. Clinton is absolutely right. If we really
believe in egalitarianism, if we really believe that we're just the same
as Haitians and Vietnamese and Mexican mestizos, then it won't make any
difference when we become a minority, will it? 

And more than anything else this will have been a direct consequence of
the Second World War: a direct consequence of our fighting on the Jewish
side in that war. Before the war we had a reasonably sensible
immigration policy in America. It was very hard for anyone but a
European immigrant to get in. But after we had fought a war in support
of equality, how could we justify letting Europeans in and keeping
Asians and Mexicans and Haitians out? Anyway, we let ourselves be talked
into scrapping our racially exclusionary immigration laws by the same
bunch of Jews who had lied us into the war. And so here we are.

You know, while I'm on the subject of immigration and the Jews, I should
mention that the Jews are a little bashful about this. They realize that
America's open-border policy is increasingly unpopular with White
Americans, and they don't want to be blamed for its consequences. And
yet it is a Jewish policy, and they remain solidly behind it, despite a
few diversionary moves designed to throw us off the track, such as
occasional well publicized expressions of concern by prominent Jews
about the dangers of uncontrolled immigration. The fact is that the big
media bosses are solidly behind increasing America's so-called
"diversity" through more non-White immigration, and the big media bosses
are nearly all Jews. Mr. Clinton is solidly behind the continued
darkening of America, and if Mr. Clinton supports a policy you can be
sure it is Jewish, whether it is forcing the U.S. military to accept
homosexuals or arguing for Federal laws against so-called "hate crimes"
or keeping the borders open.

In this regard it is instructive to note that what the Jews are doing to
the United States with non-White immigration, they also are doing to the
countries which were our allies in the great war to save the Jews.
Britain, for example, is fast becoming non-British. London is a
multi-racial cesspool as bad as any city in America. And Prime Minister
Tony Blair takes his orders from the same people that Bill Clinton does.

Australia, of course, was also one of our allies in the crusade to
destroy Germany, and White Australians, like White Americans, have
become alarmed about the efforts of the Jews and their collaborators to
destroy the European character of the Australian population. One
patriotic Australian woman, Pauline Hanson, has been especially
effective in giving expression to the concerns of White Australians. She
formed Australia's new political party, called "One Nation," and has
done startlingly well in provincial elections. The Jews and their camp
followers in Australia are frantic to stop her "keep Australia White"
movement. So just last week Jews in Australia stole the membership list
of One Nation and began publishing the names and addresses of Pauline
Hanson's supporters in the Australia/Israel Review, hoping to intimidate
them into dropping out of the party. Two thousand names were published
last week, with the threat that the remainder of the party's supporters
will have their names published in future issues of Australia/Israel
Review. The reason this threat is intimidating is that the mass media in
Australia, just as in the United States, are utterly hostile to anyone
not in accord with Jewish policy. One good aspect of the affair,
however, is that it has caused an unexpectedly strong backlash in
Australia against the Jews.

Anyway, it all hangs together: the increasingly favored status of
homosexuals, the White slave trade, and the Jewish campaign to darken
the White world everywhere: in Europe, in America, and in Australia. And
it all came directly out of our great victory in the Second World War.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail:  national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

(c) 1998 National Vanguard Books