American Dissident Voices Broadcast of March 7, 1998

Check Your Blankets and Candles
by Dr. William Pierce


I was hoping that I'd have enough new information on the Middle East
situation before this broadcast to make a forecast, but I don't. I do
see the displeasure of the Jewish policymakers in the Clinton government
with the agreement between Iraq and the UN which has temporarily stymied
their war plans. It's clear that Madeleine Albright, for example, hates
the new agreement and would much prefer to be bombing Iraqis now instead
of later. And I see that the Republican politicians, in an effort to
please the Jewish media bosses and money men, are rattling their sabers
even louder than the Democrats. Mississippi's Republican Senator Trent
Lott is a good example of that. He's a man with Presidential ambitions,
and I'm sure that he's not issuing his calls to ignore the UN agreement
and launch an all-out war against Iraq without having consulted with his
Jewish advisers and financial backers first.

So my guess is that the war against Iraq has been delayed for only a few
months at the most -- perhaps for only a few weeks -- and the same
people that almost got the war started last week still intend to have
their war. They are determined to cripple Iraq by one means or another.
But beyond that I just don't know enough at this time to make any
predictions.

I suspect though that the new agreement between the UN and Iraq will not
be good for Bill Clinton. Getting the war started soon was his one hope
of keeping the Bill and Monica story out of the headlines for a while,
but he let his chance slip. Now the people who are hot for a war have
one more reason to be unhappy with Clinton -- and they now have time to
write Clinton off and groom Al Gore to be their new war lord.

I've been turning this whole business of Bill Clinton and his problems
over in my mind, trying to get the best perspective on it. As I
mentioned a couple of weeks ago, when I was in Germany recently the
Germans couldn't believe what they were seeing in the news about
Clinton. It just didn't seem possible to them that the head of the most
powerful country on earth could be such an irresponsible clown, such a
degenerate, such a reckless criminal. I explained to them that that's
democracy in America. But I must admit that I'm having a little trouble
myself accepting the Clinton situation as real. It seems more like some
sort of bad dream.

I can understand even a very successful and powerful politician having a
personal quirk or two. I would not be surprised if an investigation of
the 100 top politicians and bureaucrats in Washington found that a
number of them have a weakness for bimbos -- or occasionally indulge
themselves with cocaine -- or have sticky fingers in financial matters.
And of course, they all lie on a daily basis. Politics in a democracy
does not attract people of sterling character. But in Bill Clinton all
of these vices are combined and exaggerated to the point of
grotesqueness, of freakishness. A couple of weeks ago -- on February 12
-- the _Wall Street Journal _had a full-page spread which summarized
some of Clinton's quirks in a graphic way. Considered all together, it's
rather breathtaking.

Take the Whitewater scandal, for example, which most Americans probably
are tired of hearing about. One of the principals in that scandal, Susan
McDougal, an officer of the bankrupt Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan,
has been sitting in prison in Arkansas for the last six months because
even after being given a grant of immunity from prosecution she still
refuses to tell a grand jury whether or not Clinton was involved in the
illegal activity of Madison Guaranty and also whether or not Clinton
lied under oath when he testified at her trial on bank fraud charges.
Now, Susan McDougal isn't sitting in prison because she likes to be
there. All she has to do to get out and also to remain in favor with her
good friend Bill Clinton is tell the grand jury that Clinton wasn't
involved in or aware of criminal activity at Madison Guaranty and that
he testified truthfully at her trial. So why doesn't she just tell the
world that Clinton is innocent, so she can get out of prison? We can
only assume that it's because he's not innocent, and she's afraid to
perjure herself, and somebody is making it worth her while to keep her
mouth shut and remain in prison on the contempt charge.

And of course, we can understand her fear of being caught in perjury.
Things are turning up all the time which indicate that Clinton was, in
fact, involved with Madison Guaranty and that he lied when he testified
at her trial. One of those things is a cashed check for $27,000 from
Madison Guaranty to Clinton which recently was found in a box of old
bank records that everybody thought had been destroyed. There are many
very strong reasons for thinking Clinton committed criminal acts in the
Madison Guaranty affair, and Susan McDougal's willingness to sit in
prison on a contempt charge rather than tell what she knows about him is
only one of those reasons. In more normal times this McDougal affair
alone would have been enough to bring down a President, even without
formal charges being filed against him. And the only reason formal
charges haven't been filed is because evidence disappears, or witnesses
disappear, or witnesses take the Fifth Amendment, or they let themselves
be jailed for contempt rather than testify. There's a lot of money
involved in keeping Bill Clinton in the White House, and when there are
a lot of crooked lawyers and a lot of money involved in a case, it
becomes hard to pin things down.

And that's the pattern we see in a whole array of scandals in which
Clinton is involved: hints of perjury, witnesses who refuse to testify,
all sorts of indications of wrongdoing but just not quite enough for a
guaranteed conviction if he's indicted. But also none of the scandals
ever gets cleared up. Clinton manages to wriggle out of one after
another -- barely -- but they just keep accumulating. And the evidence
of his crookedness just keeps piling up. 

Back in 1992 he went on television and told Americans that he hadn't had
a sexual relationship with Gennifer Flowers while he was the governor of
Arkansas. In a deposition he was forced to give in the Paula Jones case
a few weeks ago he admitted under oath that he =did= have a sexual
relationship with Gennifer. And of course, there was much more to the
Gennifer Flowers affair than Clinton's uncontrollable zipper: there was
his illegal use of Arkansas state troopers to facilitate his rendezvous
with Gennifer and his payoff to her with a state job, which resulted in
a job-discrimination suit by the state employee who got bumped to make
way for Gennifer. And there is solid evidence that Clinton did with
Gennifer what he denies doing with Monica: namely, suborning perjury.
There's a taped telephone conversation in which Clinton tells Gennifer
to lie about their relationship, to deny everything.

Hillary and her Jewish "spin doctors" in the White House are blaming all
of the bad publicity about Clinton on a "vast, right-wing conspiracy."
The right wingers are out to get Clinton and destroy his Presidency,
Hillary says, because they don't like his "progressive" policies. But
you know, Clinton has been involved in the same sort of recklessly
crooked behavior and the consequent scandals throughout his adult life,
from the time he was dodging the draft and organizing demonstrations for
the Viet Cong back in the 1960s. Ten years ago, when he was the governor
of Arkansas, he gave a state pardon to his biggest Arkansas supporter,
Dan Lasater, after Lasater was convicted of dealing in cocaine. That
sort of thing really looked bad back then, just as it looks bad today,
and one can only suspect payoffs and a lot of other dirty things that
haven't come to light yet.

Ten years ago, of course, Clinton's boosters in the media were doing a
much better job of protecting him and covering up his quirks. Since the
Monica Lewinsky scandal came to light a few weeks ago they seem to have
given up on him. They've decided to cut their losses. Clinton is just
too much of a tar baby. To quote Gennifer Flowers when she heard about
Clinton's latest problems: "You'd think the boy would learn."

But Clinton is a true child of the 1960s. When he was growing up he
learned not only that the world owed him a living, but that he was
entitled to have whatever he wanted to have. He learned that if it feels
good, he should do it. He learned contempt for such concepts as
responsibility, duty, honor, and patriotism. He learned that the most
valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. He
learned that he had a real =talent= for lying and could lie himself out
of any problem. But, as Ms. Flowers has suggested, he doesn't seem to
have learned anything since then.

I can cope with the fact that we have a constitutional psychopath for a
President. A lot of morally crippled people grew up during the 1960s. A
lot of people took their lead from the Jews back then and have continued
to follow that lead. What bothers me a lot more than the fact that
Clinton is a moral cripple, is his acceptance by a substantial portion
of the American public: not just acceptance, but approval. That says a
lot about what's wrong with America, not just what's wrong with Clinton.

It's not just the welfare class, the feminists, and the rest of the
Clinton coalition that deserve the contempt of every true patriot for
continuing to associate themselves with Clinton: it's everyone in
Washington who still addresses him as "Mr. President" instead of
spitting in his face -- or at least turning away from him and simply
refusing to recognize him. Do these bureaucrats, lawyers, and
politicians who still show respect to Clinton -- who still shake his
hand and smile at him and treat him as if he deserved respect -- do they
understand what they are doing to undermine respect for themselves and
for the institutions they represent? Do they understand what they are
doing to undermine respect for the government itself and for the
democratic process? 

No American patriot should tolerate Bill Clinton remaining in the White
House. No American patriot should tolerate the government of which Bill
Clinton is the head. No American patriot should tolerate the system
which put Bill Clinton at the head of the U.S. government.

Now, if I had said that a year ago, most people would simply have
dismissed me as an extremist -- and I suppose that many still would. But
every =patriot= now must either agree with me or at least be made very
uncomfortable by what I have said. And I am defining as a real patriot
everyone who really cares whether or not the President is a
constitutional psychopath, who is really distressed by having such a man
as President, and who also is responsible enough to be familiar with the
facts, responsible enough to pay attention to what is happening,
responsible enough to learn what he needs to learn in order to make
informed decisions as a citizen.

If you are reading this you probably either you agree with me or you're
on the way to agreeing with me. If you're a patriot you cannot simply
ignore what's happening and go on about your personal business. You
cannot dismiss what I've said and keep pretending that we don't have a
grave national problem that requires a grave remedy. This is why the
controlled media have such fear and loathing in their voices whenever
they utter the word "patriot." By supporting and covering for Clinton
for so long they have put themselves in an exposed position, a position
in which every patriot must consider them as much enemies of America as
is Clinton himself. I think that they've decided to cut their losses by
letting Clinton go, but it may be too late for them.

Think about it! Did ancient Rome ever have a more degenerate or criminal
government than the one we have now? An even more disturbing question:
Did Rome ever have a more irresponsible or debased citizenry than we
have in America today?

It's clear what patriots ought to do about Bill Clinton and his
government and the system which gave us Clinton and his government. They
won't do quite yet what they ought to do, for several reasons. First, as
I noted, many of them are still only on the way to accepting their
responsibility as patriots. Like the Germans, they still can't quite
believe that the Clinton situation is real. And second, there still
would be a lot of opposition to doing what we ought to do. Opposition
not just from the rabble who don't care that Clinton is a criminal and a
degenerate and who approve of him because they like his "progressive"
programs, but also opposition from a fairly large segment of the
population which is not quite rabble and not quite patriotic: a segment
which likes to think of itself as moral, respectable, and even
responsible, but which is too conservative, too authoritarian, too
inflexible in its thinking to accept a direct attack on the government
and on the system underlying the government.

A great many police and military personnel belong to this segment. These
people have a very strong streak of authoritarianism, a very strong
tendency to believe whatever they hear on television. They don't
question what they hear. Tell them, "This is the President of the United
States, and you must follow his orders," and they will salute, say
"yessir!," and follow orders. They don't pay attention to all of those
stories about perjury, demonstrating for the Viet Cong, and sending out
state troopers to round up bimbos. They don't pay much attention to
anything except the ball games, really. They like to wear uniforms, to
salute, and to say "yessir!" So they'll oppose any effort by patriots to
do what ought to be done -- up to a point. And that point is when the
television no longer tells them that Bill Clinton is the boss and that
they should salute him. That point is when they see the people around
Clinton turning away from him, and they no longer can be sure about
where the authority lies. And you know, we're closer to that point than
we've ever before been in this country. 

It's a fascinating situation. The Jews chose Bill Clinton as their tool,
and very late in the game they have realized that he is such a badly
flawed tool that he has jeopardized their whole enterprise. How will
they correct their mistake?

If they just hang onto him and continue covering for him, their exposure
continues to increase. The likelihood of a revolution -- or at least, an
assassination and a great deal of civil disorder -- grows the longer
Clinton stays in office. They don't want to be pulled down with Clinton.
If they ditch him and switch to Al Gore, on the other hand, the system
suffers a substantial shock, a substantial loss in prestige, with many
of the authoritarian types on whom the system depends for its
unquestioning support becoming badly disoriented. 

It's clear that some of the media bosses have made the decision to ditch
Clinton now. But there's still some hesitation. Some Jewish elements are
still supporting him. Actually, this is an ideal situation for patriots.
Clinton's departure promises to be messy. The authoritarians will have
time to become thoroughly confused. The rabble will have time to become
angry about the "vast, right-wing conspiracy" destroying their hero. And
the patriots who're still "on the way" will have time to decide what
they ought to do.

It's really too bad that a revolution in the United States cannot be the
clean and relatively bloodless affair that it is in a banana republic,
where all a general has to do is surround the presidential palace with
his troops and seize the national television station. If he can hold
onto the television station for a few days, he's won. It'll be
infinitely messier and bloodier in the United States. And it won't be a
revolution just against a corrupt President or bad policies. It'll be
much more fundamental than that. It'll be a revolution against a failed
system of government.

Well, I'm sorry that I haven't been able to give you a very specific
forecast today. Let me tell you something to be on the lookout for,
though. Watch for resignations by top bureaucrats in Washington. They
will know what's coming before the rest of us do, and a lot of them will
be jumping ship, hoping to avoid being sucked down in the undertow. When
you see that happening, you may want to consider tying up your own loose
personal ends. Make sure that you have a good stock of blankets and
candles and canned goods -- and ammunition. If you live in a large city,
you may want to think about a vacation in a safer area for a month or
two.

I really don't know what's coming or when it's coming. But I do know
that we have a very unusual and dangerous situation in this country now.
One way or another the bizarre and unnatural experiment of government by
Jewish media bosses is coming to an end.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail:  national@natvan.com please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

(c) 1998 National Vanguard Books